|
Post by viperousperky on Feb 16, 2019 12:47:25 GMT -5
Same way I explained in the other thread: at the time of posting lysell was an 89 because he had not yet won the Calder. This deal had 3 accepts before he won the Calder so it was already final before he got upgraded to a 91. So nothing was posted with case information.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Blues GM on Feb 16, 2019 12:57:16 GMT -5
Same way I explained in the other thread: at the time of posting lysell was an 89 because he had not yet won the Calder. This deal had 3 accepts before he won the Calder so it was already final before he got upgraded to a 91. So nothing was posted with case information. Everyone understands that, but the deal was already iffy with him being an 89 to begin with. I don't think some of the people voting were clear on the fact that he was potentially about to receive a +2 as well, as most assumed ratings are final in trades. Then in my eyes, it became too much. With that said, it's not like Leafs is walking away with this deal. He should clearly be getting more. Even just not including Rasanen would help. I mean, I would have paid a premium to get Fabian beside Byfield lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 13:54:02 GMT -5
Same way I explained in the other thread: at the time of posting lysell was an 89 because he had not yet won the Calder. This deal had 3 accepts before he won the Calder so it was already final before he got upgraded to a 91. So nothing was posted with case information. Ratings have to be changed. I remember at a different league I was trading JVR for the 1st overall pick and the deal wasn't passed until downgrades were posted. JVR was downgraded and the trade was rejected. Lysell was upgraded and that needs to be shown. Not to mention, this trade was posted 3 minutes before the finalization of the first award was posted, meaning Leafs knew Lysell already won.
|
|
|
Post by Player Rep on Feb 16, 2019 13:59:35 GMT -5
Same way I explained in the other thread: at the time of posting lysell was an 89 because he had not yet won the Calder. This deal had 3 accepts before he won the Calder so it was already final before he got upgraded to a 91. So nothing was posted with case information. Ratings have to be changed. I remember at a different league I was trading JVR for the 1st overall pick and the deal wasn't passed until downgrades were posted. JVR was downgraded and the trade was rejected. Lysell was upgraded and that needs to be shown. Not to mention, this trade was posted 3 minutes before the finalization of the first award was posted, meaning Leafs knew Lysell already won. How would I know that Lysell won when I posted this trade and then notified the league that the Calder was tied and had 24 hours before it would be split?
|
|
|
Post by Player Rep on Feb 16, 2019 14:00:17 GMT -5
Same way I explained in the other thread: at the time of posting lysell was an 89 because he had not yet won the Calder. This deal had 3 accepts before he won the Calder so it was already final before he got upgraded to a 91. So nothing was posted with case information. Finally - logic being applied
|
|
|
Post by Player Rep on Feb 16, 2019 14:01:36 GMT -5
nawh, this is now accepted/final, had the trade rules wrong If you're gonna use your authority to cheat then go ahead, you know the rules as much as anybody. Your player information was not up to date when people started to vote. Once the information came out that Lysell was a 91, not an 89, only three people voted and all 3 were rejects. If this trade did not involve you, you would have finalized it as a rejected trade. dude I am cheating?? wtf lol enjoy your FA period since I am a cheater and therefore should not be Pr or ADMIN or in fact simmer
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks GM on Feb 16, 2019 14:03:42 GMT -5
Who cares! If the damn admin is OK getting less than market value, then pass it through. For fuck sakes you guys...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 14:08:11 GMT -5
I'm done arguing, I've said my piece. I just hope other people don't try this cause if they do they'll use this exact trade a reference for why they should be allowed to.
|
|
|
Post by Player Rep on Feb 16, 2019 14:10:26 GMT -5
I'm done arguing, I've said my piece. I just hope other people don't try this cause if they do they'll use this exact trade a reference for why they should be allowed to. dude lol they wont have to worry about that cause I am done with AWARDS - so reference wont matter now
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 14:20:04 GMT -5
I'm done arguing, I've said my piece. I just hope other people don't try this cause if they do they'll use this exact trade a reference for why they should be allowed to. dude lol they wont have to worry about that cause I am done with AWARDS - so reference wont matter now Awards, upgrades and downgrades happen every season.
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks GM on Feb 16, 2019 15:30:31 GMT -5
Get over it Joubran. You're literally bitching because the guy "cheated" in order to rip himself off. Lol. Sure, the player info should be accurate, but this isnt the NHL. We are here for fun. The error didnt benefit him, it fucked him. So who gives a shit! Dudes who do what you're doing right now kills sims...and we are struggling to keep these leagues alive, so do your part. Sometimes it's best to leave shit alone. You're a veteran...lead by example.
|
|