|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Apr 11, 2019 21:46:33 GMT -5
To C Tyson Jost TWF 88 - 9.0M UFA 2027 (26) - [WPG retains 0.750M -> 2027. 8.25M hit]LD Dylan Samberg DFD 83 - 2.5M UFA 2027 (25) WPG 2025 2nd To C Aleksander Barkov PLY 89 - 11.0M UFA 2027 (28) - [CBJ retain 2.0M -> 2025, 1.0M -> 2026. 9.0M hit]LD Christian Djoos TWD 84 - 3.5M UFA 2027 (29) TOR is happy to give Sasha more ice time in WPG after McDavid came home. ACCEPTS @whahockeyguy96
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2019 22:21:36 GMT -5
Accepts. More than happy to get sasha back and to play in the amazing city of Winnipeg.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TOR - WPG
Apr 11, 2019 22:38:08 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2019 22:38:08 GMT -5
Lmao Jets has to retain AND give up a 2nd? ...um no.
Reject.
|
|
|
Post by Old Greg on Apr 11, 2019 22:53:03 GMT -5
Lmao Jets has to retain AND give up a 2nd? ...um no. Reject. He’s gaining 2 overalls?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TOR - WPG
Apr 11, 2019 23:13:10 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2019 23:13:10 GMT -5
Lmao Jets has to retain AND give up a 2nd? ...um no. Reject. He’s gaining 2 overalls? And getting 6 years older, total, in the process.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TOR - WPG
Apr 12, 2019 6:41:59 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2019 6:41:59 GMT -5
You’re gonna reject over a retention that’s less than 1M? Seriously?
Accept
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Blues GM on Apr 12, 2019 8:35:50 GMT -5
Lol Kruze rejects all retention trades. I feel like if two 85s were traded for each other, one making 14M, the other making 5M, if the one making 14M had 7M retention, Kruze would reject based on the retention.
Accepted and finalized.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TOR - WPG
Apr 12, 2019 9:18:32 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2019 9:18:32 GMT -5
Lol Kruze rejects all retention trades. I feel like if two 85s were traded for each other, one making 14M, the other making 5M, if the one making 14M had 7M retention, Kruze would reject based on the retention. No, I'm saying retention or the pick, not both. It's the fact that CBJ is on the hook paying for $2M in retention for Barkov already, putting Jost & Barkov at the same cap hit, which virtually makes them equal and a wash since Barkov 89 is 28 & Jost 88 is 26, then you have Djoos 29 & Samberg 25 at only 1 overall & $1M cap differential, but there's 4 years separating the 2. Why should WPG have to pay retention AND a pick just to lose 6 years of youth for a lousy 2 overall on 2 players that have a higher likelihood of being downgraded than the ones he's giving up? That doesn't seem fair to me. I'm not sure how it does to anyone else.
|
|