|
Post by cromkey on Aug 21, 2019 13:59:57 GMT -5
Take Sillinger out and hopefully we donβt have to see Bennettβs name in trade talks for awhile lol Then it's the wrong way. A 25 yo RFA is worth more than two mediocre 3rd pairing guys IMO Sandin + Schmaltz > Bennett. But if you really want to do this, I will change my vote because I was mistaken thinking Bennett should be a UFA
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:00:40 GMT -5
Post by cromkey on Aug 21, 2019 14:00:40 GMT -5
My rejection is based on the fact he agreed in PM to trade me Sillinger in deal and that I'm sure someone would take Bennett's rights if he was being as reasonable on the ask as he is for himself. That's not a valid, nor acceptable reason to reject.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:01:37 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2019 14:01:37 GMT -5
Then it's the wrong way. A 25 yo RFA is worth more than two mediocre 3rd pairing guys IMO Sandin + Schmaltz > Bennett. But if you really want to do this, I will change my vote because I was mistaken thinking Bennett should be a UFA RFA"s hold huge value and he's an 86. The compensation alone is worth more than all 3
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:03:10 GMT -5
Post by Old Greg on Aug 21, 2019 14:03:10 GMT -5
Take Sillinger out and hopefully we donβt have to see Bennettβs name in trade talks for awhile lol Then it's the wrong way. A 25 yo RFA is worth more than two mediocre 3rd pairing guys Trading between your 2 teams though everyone knows the deal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:04:53 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2019 14:04:53 GMT -5
Then it's the wrong way. A 25 yo RFA is worth more than two mediocre 3rd pairing guys Trading between your 2 teams though everyone knows the deal. Yeah to make it fair. Which this is.
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:05:49 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Seattle Kraken GM on Aug 21, 2019 14:05:49 GMT -5
My rejection is based on the fact he agreed in PM to trade me Sillinger in deal and that I'm sure someone would take Bennett's rights if he was being as reasonable on the ask as he is for himself. Read your PM's. You were never getting Sillinger. You can't reject a trade for personal reasons. You read the PMs back to yourself in sequence bud. I asked about Sillinger being added, and you asked me to add after that. No mention you'd posted this crap... Just expected me to give you a +2 upgrade AND a developing goalie for an 80 that's out of auto upgrades. πππ No wonder you can't trade Bennett to anyone else but yourself when you're trying to rip folks off that badly. π
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:08:04 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2019 14:08:04 GMT -5
Read your PM's. You were never getting Sillinger. You can't reject a trade for personal reasons. You read the PMs back to yourself in sequence bud. I asked about Sillinger being added, and you asked me to add after that. No mention you'd posted this crap... Just expected me to give you a +2 upgrade AND a developing goalie for an 80 that's out of auto upgrades. πππ No wonder you can't trade Bennett to anyone else but yourself when you're trying to rip folks off that badly. π Says the guy that undervalues the Calder winner compared to the entire community. You should be abstaining from rejecting for personal reasons
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:11:18 GMT -5
Post by cromkey on Aug 21, 2019 14:11:18 GMT -5
You read the PMs back to yourself in sequence bud. I asked about Sillinger being added, and you asked me to add after that. No mention you'd posted this crap... Just expected me to give you a +2 upgrade AND a developing goalie for an 80 that's out of auto upgrades. πππ No wonder you can't trade Bennett to anyone else but yourself when you're trying to rip folks off that badly. π Says the guy that undervalues the Calder winner compared to the entire community. You should be abstaining from rejecting for personal reasons Guys let's stay focused on the trade at hand. Nobody wants to sift through you guys arguing over PMs. As of right now it's 2 rejects/2accepts and 1 undecided
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Blues GM on Aug 21, 2019 14:11:38 GMT -5
This is just so greasy. Getting to pick up a young 86 for a bunch of meh realistically. Schmaltz has negative value realistically since he's now forced on your cap for the entire duration. Sandin is kind of okay, but still no guarantee. the 19 year old 73, yup maybe a future middle six, 2nd line player.
Really going to need to talk over the rules for these team to team trades.
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:11:58 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Seattle Kraken GM on Aug 21, 2019 14:11:58 GMT -5
You read the PMs back to yourself in sequence bud. I asked about Sillinger being added, and you asked me to add after that. No mention you'd posted this crap... Just expected me to give you a +2 upgrade AND a developing goalie for an 80 that's out of auto upgrades. πππ No wonder you can't trade Bennett to anyone else but yourself when you're trying to rip folks off that badly. π Says the guy that undervalues the Calder winner compared to the entire community. You should be abstaining from rejecting for personal reasons Says the guys that tried to trade said Calder winner to his primary team from his secondary for a bunch of junk he didn't want. πππ Try again.
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:13:45 GMT -5
Post by cromkey on Aug 21, 2019 14:13:45 GMT -5
Says the guy that undervalues the Calder winner compared to the entire community. You should be abstaining from rejecting for personal reasons Says the guys that tried to trade said Calder winner to his primary team from his secondary for a bunch of junk he didn't want. πππ Try again. Kruze, enough. We don't need spamming on a trade thread. You already rejected, albeit for personal reasons. Leave it at that, and if you want to continue the conversation, do it over private messages.
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:14:00 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Seattle Kraken GM on Aug 21, 2019 14:14:00 GMT -5
This is just so greasy. Getting to pick up a young 86 for a bunch of meh realistically. Schmaltz has negative value realistically since he's now forced on your cap for the entire duration. Sandin is kind of okay, but still no guarantee. the 19 year old 73, yup maybe a future middle six, 2nd line player. Really going to need to talk over the rules for these team to team trades. Agreed... But at least this was from his primary to his secondary this time. Still greasy for sure though. π
|
|
|
PHI/STL
Aug 21, 2019 14:14:16 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by viperousperky on Aug 21, 2019 14:14:16 GMT -5
This is just so greasy. Getting to pick up a young 86 for a bunch of meh realistically. Schmaltz has negative value realistically since he's now forced on your cap for the entire duration. Sandin is kind of okay, but still no guarantee. the 19 year old 73, yup maybe a future middle six, 2nd line player. Really going to need to talk over the rules for these team to team trades. Sure. But usually supposed to be an overpayment going to the secondary team. This is close, with a bit more value going to STL which I thought is how own team trades are supposed to be...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2019 14:15:02 GMT -5
This is just so greasy. Getting to pick up a young 86 for a bunch of meh realistically. Schmaltz has negative value realistically since he's now forced on your cap for the entire duration. Sandin is kind of okay, but still no guarantee. the 19 year old 73, yup maybe a future middle six, 2nd line player. Really going to need to talk over the rules for these team to team trades. What we really need is some standard values here. People are rejecting to reject. Two in a row weβve had people on either sides of value rejecting. STL can afford the cap hit because itβs gonna be steep for the 86. Philly overpaid slightly as theyβre the primary team which is the βgolden ruleβ this should never be rejected.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Blues GM on Aug 21, 2019 14:15:55 GMT -5
This is just so greasy. Getting to pick up a young 86 for a bunch of meh realistically. Schmaltz has negative value realistically since he's now forced on your cap for the entire duration. Sandin is kind of okay, but still no guarantee. the 19 year old 73, yup maybe a future middle six, 2nd line player. Really going to need to talk over the rules for these team to team trades. Sure. But usually supposed to be an overpayment going to the secondary team. This is close, with a bit more value going to STL which I thought is how own team trades are supposed to be... No, neither team is supposed to get overpaid. The entire idea was a last resort trade for even depth players. Not the primary focus of moving top tier talent. Bennett is a 3/4 F in this league.
|
|