|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 20, 2020 13:47:49 GMT -5
 Gets C Brayden Point PLY 90 - 10.0M UFA 2025 (26)retain 5M for this year and 2M for the next LW Kyle Connor TWF 91 - 7.145M UFA 2026 (25)retain 3M for this year RW Carter Verhaeghe TWF 84 - 2.50M UFA 2024 (27)  Get C Isac Lundestrom PLY 85 - 6.0M RFA 2024 (22) LW Matthew Boldy SNP 84 - 0.850M RFA 2023 (21) RW Daniel Sprong SNP 86 - 5.0M UFA 2023 (25) accepted this is a move for the future and beyond. I see great things with the youth in TB coming |
|
|
|
Post by viperousperky on Feb 20, 2020 14:34:19 GMT -5
I accept. Losing some youth, but the OA gain is worth it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Feb 20, 2020 15:27:57 GMT -5
Uhh.....are 90+ players now a wash? If so, I have to update the scoring system cause I have no idea how this is equal :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Old Greg on Feb 20, 2020 16:43:33 GMT -5
Uhh.....are 90+ players now a wash? If so, I have to update the scoring system cause I have no idea how this is equal :/ I was thinking the same thing but said fuck it because cook |
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 20, 2020 17:01:45 GMT -5
Uhh.....are 90+ players now a wash? If so, I have to update the scoring system cause I have no idea how this is equal :/ I was thinking the same thing but said fuck it because cook Thank You  I do have a master plan!! Hopefully it all works out for the best and I can bring another Cup to Tampa in another year or two . I just don't see Point and Connor as being part of that plan. I like the kids I have and the kids I want to bring in and hopefully it all comes together at the same time. By the beginning of next year the kids I'm picking will be close to the ratings of the guys I am giving away. It is all about having everything coming together at the same time is all. |
|
|
|
Post by canes435 on Feb 20, 2020 17:49:31 GMT -5
Uhh.....are 90+ players now a wash? If so, I have to update the scoring system cause I have no idea how this is equal :/ I was thinking the same thing but said fuck it because cook Shouldn’t matter who it is. Can’t just be handing 90+ players with stealer retainment over. I reject. Need more going Tampa’s way. |
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 20, 2020 18:09:54 GMT -5
I was thinking the same thing but said fuck it because cook Shouldn’t matter who it is. Can’t just be handing 90+ players with stealer retainment over. I reject. Need more going Tampa’s way. The retainment is only for one year and I would much rather do that than add contracts that I don't want going into next year. It sets me up for the exact offseason that I need. I don't want more contracts that I would have to waive period. I got 2 kids coming in and to me I get rid of contracts that I don't want moving forward. These kids will fit in perfectly going forward |
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 20, 2020 19:04:33 GMT -5
2 for and 2 against gonna be a long night |
|
|
|
Post by Old Greg on Feb 20, 2020 19:52:40 GMT -5
I change mine to a reject after thinking it over. This de values 90s in a big way. Seems like Cook should be getting a lot more or take out one of the 90s
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 20, 2020 20:52:59 GMT -5
I change mine to a reject after thinking it over. This de values 90s in a big way. Seems like Cook should be getting a lot more or take out one of the 90s Playing poorly devalues 90's unfortunatly. But we will post a new one shortly now that this one is rejected |
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks GM on Feb 20, 2020 22:39:25 GMT -5
I change mine to a reject after thinking it over. This de values 90s in a big way. Seems like Cook should be getting a lot more or take out one of the 90s I disagree. Overalls mean next to nothing anymore. You can upgrade a guy and the next year he gets downgraded. Plays like shit as a 90, plays well as an 86. Its scary to sign players for more than a couple years. EA is fucked. |
|
I do have a master plan!! Hopefully it all works out for the best and I can bring another Cup to Tampa in another year or two 
