Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 10:13:34 GMT -5
To  C Jonathan Toews TWF 89 $10,500,000 UFA 2023 (31) To  C Radek Faska TWF 83 - 2.2M RFA 2020 (25) C Ryan Suzuki PLY 70 - 2.0M RFA 2022 (18) Toews allows DAL to move Cozens back to RW as a SNP and maximize his development alongside Benn. (DAL still has Zaitsev to develop @ C so Suzuki is expendable) DAL happily Accepts Tampa Bay Lightning GM |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 10:15:54 GMT -5
Yeah
|
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators GM on Sept 2, 2018 10:21:18 GMT -5
I reject. Toews, with his contract and age should have almost near negative value when looking at a non-Gm deal. Dallas also isn't a position where Toews will make them competitive again.
Their trade block also states their wants:
-TOP 6 RW (84++) (29>) -> (Preferably RH)
-TOP 4 D (84++) (28>) -> (Preferably LD)
-BLUE CHIP PROSPECTS
Which this doesn't address.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 10:30:34 GMT -5
I reject. Toews, with his contract and age should have almost near negative value when looking at a non-Gm deal. Dallas also isn't a position where Toews will make them competitive again. Their trade block also states their wants: -TOP 6 RW (84++) (29>) -> (Preferably RH) -TOP 4 D (84++) (28>) -> (Preferably LD) -BLUE CHIP PROSPECTS Which this doesn't address. Yes a top 6 RW will be Cozens when the Stars move him back to RW. By adding Toews, they are able to replace Seguin without giving up their picks or top prospects. On top of that, if they resigned Seguin he'd be getting more money than Toews is currently being paid and Dallas would have ended up with the kind of contract Toews has now (older player). If they haven Seguin an 8 year deal (the most likely option) Seguin would have been 31 with 4 years left on his deal like Toews is now. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 15:50:56 GMT -5
Mods?
|
|
|
|
Post by viperousperky on Sept 2, 2018 18:21:54 GMT -5
I’d like this a whole lot more if Buffalo was retaining even 2M. That way that contract doesn’t look so nasty to a new gm.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 18:47:19 GMT -5
I’d like this a whole lot more if Buffalo was retaining even 2M. That way that contract doesn’t look so nasty to a new gm. Think this is a very healthy trade for DAL and their direction. While Suzuki has high potential, this still is Jonathan Toews we are talking about, and pairing him up with Benn and Cozens should make the departure of Seguin much easier to handle. Toews acquisition allows not only Cozens position to change, but allows DAL to bring in a 2nd line C in Czarnik (FA) to fill the 2nd role between Fiala-Ritche, adding a catalyst to fully development the main prospects in DAL system. DAL has almost 13M in space, this move should hardly affect them since his hit expires in 2023. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 23:06:48 GMT -5
.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 23:11:08 GMT -5
I reject. Toews, with his contract and age should have almost near negative value when looking at a non-Gm deal. Dallas also isn't a position where Toews will make them competitive again. Their trade block also states their wants: -TOP 6 RW (84++) (29>) -> (Preferably RH) -TOP 4 D (84++) (28>) -> (Preferably LD) -BLUE CHIP PROSPECTS Which this doesn't address. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 23:14:02 GMT -5
I reject. Toews, with his contract and age should have almost near negative value when looking at a non-Gm deal. Dallas also isn't a position where Toews will make them competitive again. Their trade block also states their wants: -TOP 6 RW (84++) (29>) -> (Preferably RH) -TOP 4 D (84++) (28>) -> (Preferably LD) -BLUE CHIP PROSPECTS Which this doesn't address. sorry haven't focused on changing GM Blocks as they evolve but DAL needs have changed if you look at their lines posted |
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Blues GM on Sept 3, 2018 10:07:01 GMT -5
is this accepted already?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2018 10:23:56 GMT -5
I think we are at 3 and 3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2018 10:41:47 GMT -5
If we're at 3 and 3 for a non-GM trade then it should be rejected. Hate it but it should be a landslide of acceptances for the non-GM team.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2018 10:43:22 GMT -5
wowza reject/final
|
|
