Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Upgrades
Feb 11, 2019 12:31:26 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2019 12:31:26 GMT -5
With the addition of players 23+ being able to received upgrades, I think players 20-22 should be allowed to receive MPUs now as well. Players from 18-19 are typically given additional boosts so they'd still not be allowed to receive MPUs until they're 20 but players 20+ should be able to receive MPUs now.
Let me know what you think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Upgrades
Feb 11, 2019 12:31:45 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2019 12:31:45 GMT -5
This would also be for next season onwards.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ottawa Senators GM on Feb 11, 2019 12:37:00 GMT -5
I think its good as is, personally.
|
|
|
|
Post by Player Rep on Feb 11, 2019 13:28:39 GMT -5
Yeah its not changing at all
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Upgrades
Feb 11, 2019 14:00:21 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2019 14:00:21 GMT -5
I don't understand why, if somebody could explain what makes the young guys different then I'll accept it. Right now players 23+ receive upgrades and can be MPUd, or gives them more value than young guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by viperousperky on Feb 11, 2019 14:05:19 GMT -5
I don't understand why, if somebody could explain what makes the young guys different then I'll accept it. Right now players 23+ receive upgrades and can be MPUd, or gives them more value than young guys. Young guys can’t downgrade. It’s a bonus. Look what happened to Laine |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2019 14:12:45 GMT -5
True, that's fair enough for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Blues GM on Feb 11, 2019 14:14:26 GMT -5
I'd be down to make 24 & 25-year-olds have a max of -2 on downgrades.
|
|
|
|
Upgrades
Feb 11, 2019 14:15:02 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by viperousperky on Feb 11, 2019 14:15:02 GMT -5
And 23? Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Blues GM on Feb 11, 2019 14:16:45 GMT -5
23s aren't touched, I don't think |
|
|
|
Post by Player Rep on Feb 11, 2019 14:20:23 GMT -5
This should have all been discussed when the league voted on it - not during an off-season when its already implemented.
The system is now concrete, there will be no change.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2019 14:23:10 GMT -5
I didn't think of it until now! Not to mention, any changes wouldn't be inputted until next offseason or the season after that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Feb 11, 2019 14:28:08 GMT -5
I didn't think of it until now! Not to mention, any changes wouldn't be inputted until next offseason or the season after that. Yeah regardless, there are failsafes in place for each category to ensure proper Upgrades or Downgrades when warranted. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2019 14:36:59 GMT -5
I was just offering a suggestion haha
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Upgrades
Feb 11, 2019 16:59:52 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2019 16:59:52 GMT -5
This should have all been discussed when the league voted on it - not during an off-season when its already implemented. The system is now concrete, there will be no change. We're all just seeing now how it's working, really, this isn't what imagined it would be at all. It just seems like you go hog wild, and a little overboard, on the downgrades with a concrete scale that a ___ overall should put up X amount of points or they get downgraded, which should be on a sliding scale, particularly in such cases as it was this past season with production being down league-wide, and we have our league leaders in scoring being downgraded, defenseman that may not have had great production season but still finished out the season with a +24-25 and up, still gets downgraded cuz he didn't score. How is that right? Last time I checked defensemen are supposed to play defense, correct? Why are players getting downgraded for doing what they're supposed to be doing? It seems kind of backwards, don't you think? |
|
