|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Aug 10, 2020 17:21:22 GMT -5
To  C Mike Amadio TWF 78 (24) - 0.700M RFA 2021 LW Andre Burakovsky PWF 84 (25) - 4.0 UFA 2021 G Sergei Bobrovsky HYB 88 (31) - 10.0M UFA 2022 - [MIN retains 50%. 5.0M hit] To  LW Kyle Connor TWF 88 (23) - 7.143M UFA 2026 G David Rittich HYB 84 (27) - 2.75M UFA 2021 Accept thehockeyist |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2020 17:24:09 GMT -5
And my trade gets rejected?? Lol
Reject from me. Kyle Connor for Bobrovsky is kinda ridiculous, no matter what’s included. He just got moved for Pie. Wtf
and then Rittich is included too? LOL
There NEEDS to be a standard behind what gets a reject. An 85 for 83 with a average prospect thrown in should not get a reject, and then this gets posted as if it’s helping the dude out. It’s kinda absurd
|
|
|
|
Post by thehockeyist on Aug 10, 2020 17:24:38 GMT -5
Accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators GM on Aug 10, 2020 17:30:35 GMT -5
Reject.
A F like Connor has way more value than this.
|
|
|
|
Post by viperousperky on Aug 10, 2020 17:40:47 GMT -5
And my trade gets rejected?? Lol Reject from me. Kyle Connor for Bobrovsky is kinda ridiculous, no matter what’s included. He just got moved for Pie. Wtf and then Rittich is included too? LOL There NEEDS to be a standard behind what gets a reject. An 85 for 83 with a average prospect thrown in should not get a reject, and then this gets posted as if it’s helping the dude out. It’s kinda absurd Bobs max downgrade is -3 so he is at worst an 85 next year. Quicks max downgrade is -6 making him a 79. Huge difference. |
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Aug 10, 2020 17:41:42 GMT -5
Reject Connor has so much more value than this
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Aug 10, 2020 17:43:14 GMT -5
And my trade gets rejected?? Lol Reject from me. Kyle Connor for Bobrovsky is kinda ridiculous, no matter what’s included. He just got moved for Pie. Wtf and then Rittich is included too? LOL There NEEDS to be a standard behind what gets a reject. An 85 for 83 with a average prospect thrown in should not get a reject, and then this gets posted as if it’s helping the dude out. It’s kinda absurd Bobs max downgrade is -3 so he is at worst an 85 next year. Quicks max downgrade is -6 making him a 79. Huge difference. Not too mention Bob is @ 50% retention til contract end, Burakovsky is on pace for +3 and Amadio is already guaranteed +3 to make him 81 - but yeah guess the Admin of the entire site doesnt know what value is. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2020 17:44:14 GMT -5
Yeah but he’s also losing Rittich. Look at the stats. Doesn’t make any sense at all. Make it Jones. But it still doesn’t Make up for the difference between Connor at 23 years old and fucking Bobrovsky! I wasn’t getting a premium player back. This is stupid
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Aug 10, 2020 17:44:53 GMT -5
Thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2020 17:45:33 GMT -5
Guess not. Getting really tired of this double standard between certain GMs getting accused of ripping people off, and others getting the benefit of the doubt. This is complete BS
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2020 17:48:02 GMT -5
Dudes top goalie goes down, I tried to offer him a stopgap with a winning resume, for lame ass Jones. I get accused of trying to rip him. So what happens? Someone trying to HELP him, takes probably his top asset, his top goalie, and unloads their worst contract. Hmmmmm
|
|
|
|
CGY - MIN
Aug 10, 2020 17:55:59 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by viperousperky on Aug 10, 2020 17:55:59 GMT -5
I don’t think Connor is on pace to upgrade so he stays a 88, bura becomes an 87, bob is still an 85 with retention. I don’t know why but people don’t often want Connor in this league. He gets passed around a lot
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Aug 10, 2020 18:00:31 GMT -5
Dudes top goalie goes down, I tried to offer him a stopgap with a winning resume, for lame ass Jones. I get accused of trying to rip him. So what happens? Someone trying to HELP him, takes probably his top asset, his top goalie, and unloads their worst contract. Hmmmmm Dude you offered a G that is your 3rd string, with another year left & that is playing so shit that you wanted to give mins to a 76 OA instead. Then you get an 83 G & a high value prospect back? Common man.. CGY at least gets an elite G to play for an elite team @ 5.0M hit, this year & next. MIN has been running with a top 4 D that has a 74, 75, 78 OA on it, with a top 6 fwds that have a 76, 81, 82 & 82 OA so don't expect Rittich numbers to last, just like don't expect Bob numbers to last. Burakovsky is on pace to be 87 next season, Amadio will be 81, Connor is on pace to stay same & Bob/Rittich are wild cards. The value is there for both teams. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2020 18:00:40 GMT -5
Yeah, and Jones was in for a downgrade too. That trade should’ve been a non issue. I don’t have anything else to add. If people want to believe this somehow makes sense for Calgary, when everyone seems so concerned with “helping” him, I guess I don’t have anything else to add. I see how things work. Giving up Connor in this deal makes no sense. Especially when Bobo could’ve been had for ALOT less.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2020 18:04:10 GMT -5
Mid 80 players are a dime a dozen, as youve ALL pointed out to me in EVERY DEAL I’ve had rejected. So amadio doesn’t get to even get brought into conversation. This is Bobo+Bura for Connor+Rittich. It’s weak, it doesn’t make sense for him to give up a player like Connor to get players that could be had for very little.
|
|
