|
|
Post by Dallas Stars GM on Jan 20, 2021 8:57:28 GMT -5
can we have a conversation about clauses? maybe do a vote? personally i hate them. i understand the "realism" of them but i honesty think they are bad for sim sites. there are alot of other realistic things that we dont follow so why clauses? my team sucks. to make my team better i need to make trades but as a bottom dweller i cant acquire star players even though im willing to send star players out. its very frustrating and to be honest the headache makes me not even bother trying to trade half the time becasue there is no point wasting my time when half the deals i post get rejected because of clauses or "fairness". if i cant trade then what is the point of playing these sites? some will argue the point of it being "a challenge" or "realistic, but i dont want challenging and realistic. and to be honest its hard enough to trade with most dudes on the site lol. i just want to have fun. anyone else feel this way?  |
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators GM on Jan 20, 2021 9:04:25 GMT -5
I like the new rule. I think it adds a certain merit especially when we hit FA and a team does offer a NTC, it'll be valuable.
|
|
|
|
clauses
Jan 20, 2021 9:55:46 GMT -5
Post by Florida Panthers GM on Jan 20, 2021 9:55:46 GMT -5
I would be willing to have a the rule the Wild brought up about waiving clauses in the off season. But i think they should stay during the season. But I am big on realism. I play on these sites for the realism aspect. But thats just my personal opinion.
|
|
|
|
clauses
Jan 20, 2021 9:58:01 GMT -5
Post by New York Islanders GM on Jan 20, 2021 9:58:01 GMT -5
I dont think like the rule, your right boston
|
|
kevb
Nikita Filatov
kevb
Posts: 79
|
Post by kevb on Jan 20, 2021 10:31:51 GMT -5
Keep clauses, the realism of this site is what make it worth being here! If guys want to have fun without clauses just go play franchise mode!
|
|
|
|
Post by Old Greg on Jan 20, 2021 10:47:17 GMT -5
I like the new rule. I think it adds a certain merit especially when we hit FA and a team does offer a NTC, it'll be valuable. Yes but most of the clauses we didn’t give out. I agree with Boston it restricts trading in a big way. I’d have no problem with the rule if clauses were only for guys we signed. I’ll never understand why guys like clauses we didn’t sign just restricts activity |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Jan 20, 2021 10:50:31 GMT -5
I will make a poll regarding clauses in the offseason though they won't be removed during regular season
|
|
|
|
clauses
Jan 20, 2021 11:05:12 GMT -5
Post by Minnesota Wild GM on Jan 20, 2021 11:05:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by gingerbreadman on Jan 20, 2021 11:36:47 GMT -5
I like the current rules but maybe we should let it be a free for all in the offseason. I would only vote to get rid of clauses that we inherited now if there was a penalty for doing so. Players signed those clauses and took less money. On my team, John Gibson, if he didn't sign the NTC, there's no way he signs for only 6.4M.
Not sure if this is a dumb idea or not but maybe have a league discussion on a one time offer in the offseason to remove any NTC/NMC that the league inherited. Ones that were signed before and we had no control over. This would be at a price though. Not giving teams an out because their teams suck and they want to move top players with clauses.
NTC = 1M added to contract
NMC = 1.5M added to contract
Just a suggestion because it would be hard to fully eliminate clauses now that we've gone thru more than half a season.
|
|
